|
Notices |
It's been a while, Unregistered -- Welcome back to Eratosphere! |
|
|
09-22-2010, 03:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,666
|
|
Safe, predictable, uninspiring choices then.
|
09-23-2010, 02:17 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 222
|
|
Alex, others here would get their hands slapped for the kind of response you just gave to Philip. Granted, I'm just a bystander, here....but most of your mods that I read daily would not tolerate that kind of personal response. It will be interesting to see if they do when you make it.
My comment does not speak to your choices, but to your response to Philip.
Last edited by Jones Pat; 09-23-2010 at 02:21 AM.
|
09-23-2010, 04:01 AM
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 4,942
|
|
Pat, the response is referentially factual.
|
09-23-2010, 06:51 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Halcott, New York
Posts: 9,948
|
|
Running a workshop board and at the same time (and under the same name) a more-active-than-before publication/awards network, Alex, may create a host of such new snafus. Pat makes a serious point. Philip expresses his opinion. You respond with the sort snarky candor often found in public workshops but rarely in private editorial practice. Ouch. Something to think about.
Nemo
|
09-23-2010, 10:36 AM
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 4,942
|
|
Viable opinions go with basis, not aftermath.
|
09-23-2010, 11:47 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Takoma Park, MD
Posts: 3,706
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Pepple
Viable opinions go with basis, not aftermath.
|
It may be I'm being dense, but could you explain that, please?
|
09-23-2010, 03:08 PM
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 4,942
|
|
Ed, It's all in this thread. So much so already.
|
09-24-2010, 01:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 5,479
|
|
Alex, even if provoked, it's generally bad form to rub unsuccessful submissions in the face of would-be contributors. Moreover, an unsuccessful submission to a journal should not mean that one permanently forfeits the right to criticize it.
And here I was, thinking I'd send in a submission to AbleMuse at some point, but if your response to Phil is any indication of your level of respect for would-be contributors, I think I'll refrain, actually.
|
09-24-2010, 03:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada and Uruguay
Posts: 5,860
|
|
Quincy,
I would wager that it's also generally considered bad form (and looked upon as "sour grapes" ) to publicly attack an editor's choice as Philip has done. And after all Alex does to keep Able Muse and Eratosphere a thriving artistic community . . .
I'm sure Alex had a tough time deciding on which poems, stories and essays to nominate for these prizes, considering the pool of talent he had to choose from.
How would you feel if someone publicly panned you and/or Anna for TRR's nominations in such terms? You'd probably want to tell them to f*** off. At least Alex is being quite restrained in his responses.
|
|
|
Tags
|
brenda morris, essay, fiction, nominations, poetry, pushcart, pushcart prize 2010, stephen edgar, steve mitchell, timothy murphy, timothy steele, turner cassity |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member Login
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,460
Total Threads: 22,310
Total Posts: 275,686
There are 5201 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum Sponsor:
|
|
|
|
|
|