|
|
|

02-25-2016, 02:49 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dorset, UK.
Posts: 641
|
|
How about the increasingly frequent horror," outside of . . . " much loved by BBC on-the-spot reporters?
"I'm standing outside of Number10." (And everywhere else, it now seems.)
The BBC is now the prime offender against the most basic principles of good English. While I have no objection to the overbearing old Reith turning in his grave, I think he should be saved from the increasingly likely prospect of turning inside OF it.
|

02-25-2016, 07:58 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ga., USA
Posts: 1,436
|
|
Martin,
Your post reminded me of this viral email. In most of the cases, I think the word in question is overly superfluous. But in some cases it does seem to add some spice.
http://www.tysknews.com/LiteStuff/up.htm
|

02-25-2016, 08:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 16,718
|
|
Without the "of," though, I don't think Groucho Marx's comment would have been as funny: "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read."
|

02-25-2016, 09:05 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ga., USA
Posts: 1,436
|
|
And in David Steinberg's old comedy routine, he not only cites a redundancy, but commits one as well:
"God says, 'Take off the shoes from off of your feet ...," God says in His redundant way."
|

02-25-2016, 09:07 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Old South Wales (UK)
Posts: 6,780
|
|
Fair makes you want to throw UP, eh?
(Just remember not to inhale...)
.
Last edited by Ann Drysdale; 02-25-2016 at 09:10 AM.
Reason: clarifying link to earlier posts.
|

02-25-2016, 09:42 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 1,657
|
|
Not a redundancy but a pet peeve: those who pronounce the word nuclear as NUCULAR (new-queue-ler). Executable crime, surely.
|

02-25-2016, 12:00 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Old South Wales (UK)
Posts: 6,780
|
|
Yes, especially when, like GWB, they have the say-so to press the big red button.
|

02-25-2016, 01:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,161
|
|
In the U.S. the expression is "hold the fort down." To me all you need to do is hold the fort, as in hold the line, so down is superfluous. Anyway, why must it be held down, is it in danger of floating up? I thought a battle line lost ground by having to retreat backward or gained ground by advancing forward; so what's the down for? If there was a real fort and someone asked me to hold the fort down, I would tell him not to worry, since gravity would do that for us just fine. I would say it's in no danger of floating away, but we might have to hold it by making sure it doesn't have to retreat to the back of us. Besides, if you're holding something to begin with, surely it won't squiggle out of your grip to float up? Is the fort a bird? That might make a bit more sense. Hold the bird down that it might not fly up.
Last edited by Erik Olson; 02-25-2016 at 01:59 PM.
|

02-25-2016, 01:57 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12,945
|
|
Don't all Americans say nucular?
|

02-25-2016, 02:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,343
|
|
I kind of like "pre-prepared salad." I like how even the letters repeat. At my local grocery store, all the items in the deli section are misspelled. All of them! This makes me happy. In fact, I published a poem inspired by a misspelling of blueberries that looked as though the word had fermented.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Member Login
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,500
Total Threads: 22,585
Total Posts: 278,657
There are 2710 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum Sponsor:
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|