|
|
|

04-21-2024, 03:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: England, UK
Posts: 5,335
|
|
wullluf
After the wolf-thing eats him
After the wolf-thing eats him, after it shits
the parts of him that yield no sustenance
back out into the world, how come he thinks
he’s been reborn? He clearly is a dunce,
this chap. And yet – see how he skips along
without his skin. The weight he’s lost! The awful
weight of turgid flesh, see how that’s gone,
as if his world’s no longer made of offal.
But though he glides discarnate through the room,
all lipless grins, who really could suppose
he had won free, this bodiless buffoon?
Yet how relaxed he seems without his bones.
We steel ourselves. This surely will get nasty.
We hang around the wolf-thing, looking tasty.
.
Last edited by Matt Q; 04-21-2024 at 05:05 PM.
|

04-21-2024, 05:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 680
|
|
I’ve heard of some drastic weight-loss programs, but being eaten by a wolf wins the cigar!
I like the slant rhymes, and am particularly fond of “awful/offal.” I also think “discarnate” is a jewel. I did wonder, though, about the bones. Wouldn’t they have survived the digestion process?
|

04-21-2024, 05:59 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 9,110
|
|
Matt,
This is really good. I am just going to say, quickly, that your slant rhyming is just amazing!
RM
|

04-21-2024, 06:20 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 4,805
|
|
awful/offal gets my prize. The weight/weight rep could be improved. Even turgid gut sounds like something.
Last edited by R. S. Gwynn; 04-21-2024 at 06:23 PM.
|

04-21-2024, 09:48 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,628
|
|
This is damn good. It is no one else's voice. It's unique to you.
I will be back to read it more and may have something to say. Right now I don't see anything but more praise but if anything clicks I'll let you know.
Great work, Matt.
|

04-21-2024, 11:17 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 8,657
|
|
Fantastic, in every sense of the word.
I do wonder about rhyming "shits" with "thinks," but I guess it works as more of a conceptual rhyme than a phonetic one.
|

04-22-2024, 03:09 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia
Posts: 2,059
|
|
Yes, this universe is uniquely yours, Matt—though I think Tony may have been somewhere in the vicinity recently. I like the folksy idiom, the couplet and the “lipless grins” (which I didn’t recognize, but could be from Eliot). I like all the rhymes and am encouraged by the praise for a much-maligned identity rhyme. Cool.
|

04-22-2024, 07:25 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 16,719
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Copeland
I like the folksy idiom, the couplet and the “lipless grins” (which I didn’t recognize, but could be from Eliot).
|
Webster was much possessed by death
And saw the skull beneath the skin;
And breastless creatures under ground
Leaned backward with a lipless grin.
—Whispers of Immortality, TS Eliot
|

04-23-2024, 04:46 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: England, UK
Posts: 5,335
|
|
Glenn, Rick, Sam, John, Julie, Carl and Roger,
Thank you all for your comments. I'm glad this one seems to be working.
Glenn,
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Wright
I did wonder, though, about the bones. Wouldn’t they have survived the digestion process?
|
I'm thinking you've never met a wolf-thing
Rick,
Thanks, Rick. I do enjoy writing with slant rhymes.
Sam,
I'm hoping that the repetition of "weight" is doing some work in drawing out both the literal and existential meanings of "weight", but that's a useful comment, and I will give some thought to the repetition and possible alternatives.
Julie
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julie Steiner
I do wonder about rhyming "shits" with "thinks," but I guess it works as more of a conceptual rhyme than a phonetic one.
|
In UK RP, it's a fully assonant rhyme /ʃɪts/ /θɪŋks/ -- the vowel sounds are identical. As a bonus there's also consonance with /s/ at the end of both, and what I'm going to call some "near-consonance", because /t/ and /k/ have similar sounds (both are "voiceless plosives"), as do the digraphs /ʃ/ and /θ/, (due to 'h' in both). So I don't hear it as weak phonetically. Can you say more about why it doesn't work for you? Do the vowel sounds differ from each other where you are? All that aside, I do like the idea of this being a conceptual rhyme!
John,
Thanks, John. That's good to read.
Carl and Roger
To save face, I'm going to pretend I knew the Eliot poem and was referencing it.
Thanks again, everyone.
Matt
Last edited by Matt Q; 04-23-2024 at 05:15 AM.
|

04-23-2024, 08:47 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Iowa City, IA, USA
Posts: 10,401
|
|
Matt, it's terrific. It positively vibrates with scary energy.
Susan
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Member Login
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 8,500
Total Threads: 22,590
Total Posts: 278,715
There are 2730 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum Sponsor:
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|